THE STUDY ON FACTORS INFLUENCING THE DEVELOPMENT FOLLOW-UP PROCESS ON PERFORMANCE REPORT: A CASE STUDY OF OFFICE OF THE DEAN, FACULTY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, SUAN SUNANDHA RAJABHAT UNIVERSITY

Sumittra  Phromkhuntong; Chinnawat  Satsananan

Sumittra Phromkhuntong Office of the Dean, Faculty of Science and Technology, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand
Chinnawat Satsananan Office of the Dean, Faculty of Science and Technology, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand

Keywords: Follow-up process on Performance Report, Performance Report, The development of follow-up process on Performance Report

Abstract

The objectives of this study are study the processing follow up the annual performance reports and influence factors of develop the follow-up process on performance report of the Faculty of Science and Technology, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University. The study divided into 4 parts namely, follow-up process, document format form, tracking time and the channels of delivery performance reports. In this study the researcher collected data by studying the literature review and using the questionnaires. The population used in the study is the academic support staff of the Faculty of Science and Technology, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, totally 35 persons. The demographic characteristics of the respondents were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics for describe the demographic characteristics of the respondents, using frequency and percentage for analysis of factors affecting the development of follow-up process on performance report. The researchers analyze percentage, mean and standard deviation by one-way ANOVA, analyze problems, obstacles and additional suggestions using content analysis. From the study on factors influencing the development of follow-up process on performance report: a case study of Office of the Dean Faculty of Science and Technology, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, it was found that the level of comments on each side was the highest in all aspects sort by rating highest descending: document format form, tracking time, follow-up process and the channels of delivery performance reports. In addition, the hypothesis test results were also found the different ages have different levels of tracking time sending the performance reports. In this case, the level of opinion of the personnel who are under the age of 30 years is significantly different from the personal who over age 41 years, at the statistical significance 0.05.