SATISFACTION WITH COURSE OUTLINE FILING PROCESS TO BE EFFECTIVE TO RESPOND THE POLICY OF WEBOMETRICS RANKING OF WORLD UNIVERSITIES AND TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK IN EDUCATION

Bannasorn  Santhan; Chonmapat  Torasa; Aubonrat  Dueadkhunthod; Kwanruan  Rusmee

Bannasorn Santhan Faculty of Industrial Technology, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand
Chonmapat Torasa Faculty of Industrial Technology, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand
Aubonrat Dueadkhunthod Faculty of Industrial Technology, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand
Kwanruan Rusmee Faculty of Industrial Technology, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand

Abstract

This research aims to study the satisfaction of the instructors, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, who are following the process of filing the course outline in response to the policy of World Webometrics University Rankings and is based on the National Qualifications Framework in Education which is classified by gender, age, and the professors who are affiliated with.
The population used in the research are the teachers who taught in semester 1 and semester 2, academic year 2017, using 57 questionnaires and 53 for returning.
The tools used in this research is the questionnaire made by the researcher. It is from analyzing data by using standard deviation percent and the ready-made programs.
The results of this research found that:
1. Instructors in Faculty of Industrial Technology, Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, are mostly male and working in electrical technology department in the age of 41 to 45 years old.
2. The overall level of satisfaction of instructors before adjusting the course outline filing process is fair. When considered, the most satisfaction is to promote Webometrics World University Ranking. The second is that the reduction of execution, submission and publishing of course details and field experience details following TQF 3 and TQF 4. The students can download TQF 3 and TQF 4 on instructors’ private website. The less satisfaction is that the period of TQF 3 and TQF 4 publishing following the quality assurance indicator, factor 1. The level of satisfaction of instructors after adjusting the course outline filing process is the most satisfaction. It is found that the most satisfaction is the promotion of Webometrics World University Ranking and the students can download TQF 3 and TQF 4 on the instructors’ private website. The second is the reduction of execution, submission and publishing of course details (TQF 3) and field experience (TQF 4) following quality assurance indicator, factor 1. The less satisfaction is the promotion of Webometrics Ranking of World Universities.

Keywords: Satisfaction , Webometrics Ranking of World Universities , Qualifications Framework in Education